Return to content

article

Khokhlov A. M.,  Doctor of Agricultural Sci., Professor, 
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3265-1874
Fediaieva A. S.,  Ph.D., senior scientist, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1227-9873
Honcharova I .I., Ph.D., docent, https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0190-7803
Shevchenko O. B., Ph.D., docent, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6747-5487
State Biotechnological University

DOI https://doi.org/10.32900/2312-8402-2022-127-185-196

Keywords: population, breed, polymorphism, domestication, phylogeny.

Abstract

As a result of evolution, a gradual change in the hereditary structure of a species, not only the number of genes changes, but also their properties, frequency, and direction of variability. Changes in gene frequencies occurring over a relatively small period of time belong to microevolution. The breeding process in pig breeding is the microevolutionary processes originating from the ancestral forms of Sus scrofa to the modern specialized breeds of pigs. Genetic monitoring of the genetic systems of blood groups makes it possible to assess the genetic structure and processes occurring in populations.
The microevolutionary process of transformation of wild ancestral forms over the last 10-12 thousand years from transitional forms of local aboriginal to factory breeds has occurred with significant genetic and phenotypic transformations in animal populations. In this connection, it is important to clarify the correct understanding of the terms 'population' and 'breed'. Naturally, any breed is a population, but not any population is not a breed, especially since both population and population as taxonomic terms have different interpretations. In the first place, a distinction must be made between wild populations, in which microevolution takes place only by means of natural selection, and breed populations, in the development of which artificial selection was involved as a fundamental factor in microevolution. Depending on the level of methods and forms of selection, we have to distinguish local indigenous populations (e.g., Kakhetian and Mangali breeds) and basic factory breeds (Large White, Berkshire, Landrace, Duroc, etc.), which have been created for decades and centuries. The concept of a breed is closely linked to the size of the reproductive population and the range of distribution. According to FAO, in 2006 there were some 730 breeds and lines of pigs worldwide, most of which are bred in China and Europe, and 270 of which are regarded as rare breeds. At the same time, 58 breeds (25 regional and 33 international) are registered as common, i.e. occurring in more than one country. Five international breeds are now widely distributed: Large White (117 countries), Duroc (93 countries), Landrace (91 countries), Hampshire (54 countries) and Petren (35 countries).

References

  1. Khokhlov, A. M. (2004). Henetychnyy monitorinh domestykatsii svyney. Kharkiv : Espada [in Ukrainian].
  2. Tikhonov, V. N. (2008). Mikroevoliutsionnaia teoriia i praktika porodoobrazovaniia sviney. Novosibirsk : Nauka [in Russian].
  3. Konovalov, V. S., Kovalenko, V. P. & Nedvyha, M. M. (1996). Henetyka silskohospodarskykh tvaryn [Genetics of agricultural animals]. Kyiv : Urozhay [in Ukrainian].
  4. Baranovskiy, D. I., Khokhlov, A. M. & Getmanets, O. M. (2007) Biometrija v selekcii v MSEXEL [Biometrics in selection in MS EXCEL]. Kharkоv : FLP Brovin [in Ukrainian].
  5. Hryshyna, L. P. (2005). Riven fenotypovoi konsolidatsii svynei velykoi biloi porody [The level of phenotypic consolidation of pigs of the large white breed.]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn [Animal breeding and genetics]. Kyiv, 39, 88-91 [in Ukrainian].
  6. Shena, C., Tonga, X., Chena, R., Gaoa, S., Liua, X., Schinckelb, A., Lia, Y., Xua, F., & Zhoua, B. (2020). Identifying blood-based biomarkers associated with aggression in weaned pigs after mixing. Applied animal behaviour science, 224. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104927
  7. Altuhov Ju. P. (1995). Vnutrividovoe geneticheskoe raznoobrazie: monitoring i principy sohranenija [Intraspecific genetic diversity: monitoring and conservation principles.] Genetika. 31(16), 1333-1357 [in Russian].
  8. Prather, R., Redel, B.,Whitworth K., & Zhao, M. (2014). Genomic Profiling to Improve Embryogenesis in the Pig. Animal reproduction science, 149 (1-2), 39-45. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2014.04.017
  9. Ayuso, M., Fernandez, A.,  Nunez, Y., Benitez, R., Isabel, B., Barragan, C., Fernandez, A., Rey, A., Medrano, J., Canovas, A. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Muscle Transcriptome between Pig Genotypes Identifies Genes and Regulatory Mechanisms Associated to Growth, Fatness and Metabolism. Plos one, 10 (12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145162
  10. Voytenko, S. L. (2015). Otsiniuvannia stanu mistsevykh porid svyney Ukrainy ta metody selektsiyno-pleminnoi roboty s nymy [Assessment of the condition of local pig breeds of Ukraine and methods of selection and breeding work with them.]. Rozvedennia i henetyka tvaryn [Animal breeding and genetics]. Kyiv, 49, 235-242 [in Ukrainian].
  11. Ayuso, M., Fernandez, A., Nunez, Y., Benitez, R., Isabel, B., Fernandez, A.,Rey, A., Gonzalez-Bulnes, A., Medrano, Juan F., & Canovas, A. (2016). Developmental Stage, Muscle and Genetic Type Modify Muscle Transcriptome in Pigs: Effects on Gene Expression and Regulatory Factors Involved in Growth and Metabolism. Plos one, 11 (12). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167858
  12. Altukhov, Iu.P. (2003). Processy v populjacijah [Processes in populations]. Moscow: Akademkniga [in Russian].
  13. Grikshas, S., Kalashnikov, V., Dzhanibekova, G. K, Funikov, G., Ovchinnikov, A., Kulmakova, N., Yepifanov, V., Khramtsov, V., Sarimbekova, S., & Yerezhepova, M. (2019). Productivity and biological features of pigs of domestic and canadian breeding. Bulletin of the national academy of sciences of the republic of Kazakhstan, 5, 29-35. doi: 10.32014/2019.2518-1467.120
  14. Martins, J. M., Fialho, R., Albuquerque, A., Neves, J., Freitas, A., Nunes J. T., & Charneca, R. (2020). Nunes, JT., Charneca, R. Growth, blood, carcass and meat quality traits from local pig breeds and their crosses, Animal, 14 (3), 636–647. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119002222
  15. Whitworth, K., Springer, G., Forrester, J,  Spollen, W., Ries, J.,  Lamberson, W., Bivens,  N.,  Murphy, C., Mathialigan, N., & Green, J. (2014). Developmental expression of gene clusters during pig embryogenesis: an expressed sequence tag project. Biology of reproduction, 71 (4), 1230-1243. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.030239
  16. Zhang, J., Guo, W., Shen, L., Liu, Q., Deng, X., Hu, X., & Li, N. (2012). Development of a Porcine cDNA Microarray : Analysis of Clenbuterol Responding Genes in Pig (Sus scrofa) Internal Organs. Journal of integrative agriculture, 11 (11), 1877-1883. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(12)60193-2

Пошук по сайту

Оголошення

 Ми у соцмережах

 

 

Оголошується набір статей до чергового 128 номеру НТБ (правила оформлення)

Наукометричні профілі науковців ІТ НААН (подивитися)

Увага! Змінилася адреса Інституту (подивитися)

Об’ява! Оренда приміщення  (детальніше)

Звіти діяльності ДП ДГ "Гонтарівка" (подивитися)

Корисна інформація

Послуги і пропозиції:

- дослідження якості кормів та продукції тваринного походження: (Прайс)

- молекулярно-генетичні і фізіолого-біохімічні дослідження: (Прайс)

- перелік послуг, що надаються ІТ НААН:(прайс)


Наукова література