Return to content

article

 

Korh O. V., Ph.D.,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7010-1574
Platonova N. P., Doctor of Science,
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2256-7932
Aksonov Ie. A., Ph.D.,
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6292-7819
Petrash V. S., Ph.D.,
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9114-6117
Smetana A. I., a post-graduate student
Institute of animal science of NAAS of Ukraine

 

DOI https://doi.org/10.32900/2312-8402-2021-126-52-62

Keywords: feeding young rabbits, rabbits, meat productivity, probiotics.

Abstract

Rational use of fodder resources involves finding and introducing non-traditional types of fodder into the diet of animals. For a long time in animal husbandry, productivity stimulants have been used, which promote the process of conversion of feed nutrients into products and affect its quality.

Many years of research have shown that increasing the efficiency of bioconversion of feed nutrients into rabbit products depends on the type of diet, level, and completeness of feeding. A promising reserve for the production of rabbit products under such conditions is the use in the diets of new generation feeds that have immunomodulatory, anti-infective and other effects.

Probiotic is a biologically active supplement based on bacterial strains. Probiotics include typical representatives of the normal microflora of the large intestine of animals: bifidobacteria, lactic acid bacteria, streptococci. Probiotics are aimed at the competitive exclusion of opportunistic bacteria from the list of intestinal microflora, which distinguishes them from antibiotics.

The experiment involved a population of rabbits of meat and skin productivity. Two groups of young rabbits (females) control and experimental (4 heads each) were formed.

The basic diet for these groups was the same and consisted of compound feed PC 90 Lux, manufactured by KreMix LLC. The difference in feeding between groups of rabbits was the additional introduction to the main diet of rabbits of the experimental group of probiotics "Enteronormin Detox" produced by LLC "Agricultural Enterprise" Microbiological Systems at the rate of 0.5 g per 1 kg (according to the manufacturer's recommendations). The probiotic contained the bacteria Enterococcus spp. 1–5 × 107 CFU / g, Bacillus subtilis spp. 1–5 × 106 CFU / g, Lactobacillus spp. 1–5 × 106 CFU / g, chitosan, yeast autolysate, ground mustard, ground garlic, ground cinnamon, zeolite. Preliminary assessment of the chemical composition and quality of feed.

The use of the probiotic has improved the resistance of animals and increased preservation during the rearing period and has had a positive effect on the growing intensity and meat productivity of rabbits.

References

  1. Besulin, V. I., Hordiienko, V. M., Kuzmenko, P. I., Fomenko, S. H., Merkurova, M. R., Ivashenko, M. R., & Usata, N. O. (2012). Rezystentnist ta enerhiia rostu perepeliv za dii probiotyku v umovakh napivintensyvnoi tekhnolohii [Resistance and growth energy of quails under the action of probiotics in the conditions of semi-intensive technology]. Tekhnolohiia vyrobnytstva pererobky produktsii tvarynnytstva. Bilotserkivskyi NAU – Technology of livestock processing, Bila Tsekrva,7, 134–136 [in Ukrainian].
  2. Bogdanov, G. А. (1990). Kormlenie sel'skohozjajstvennyh zhivotnyh [Feeding farm animals]. Moscow: Agropromizdat [in Russian].
  3. Izmajlova, N. A. (2017). Vlijanie probiotika na nekotorye biohimicheskie pokazateli i produktivnost' krolikov v uslovijah chastnoj fermy [The influence of a probiotic on some biochemical parameters and productivity of rabbits in a private farm]. Aktual'nye problemy intensivnogo razvitija zhivotnovodstva [Actual problems of intensive development of animal husbandry, Proceedings of the 3rd Internetional Conference]. Gorki [in Russian].
  4. Izmailova, N. O., Havryliuk, O. I. (2015). Efektyvnist vykorystannia probiotyka pry vidluchenni kroleniat [The effectiveness of probiotics in weaning rabbits]. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriia: Tvarynnytstvo [Bulletin of Sumy National Agrarian University.Series: Livestock]. Sumy,6, 114–116 [in Ukrainian].
  5. Kyryliv, Ya. I., Hil, L. H., & Ostashevskyi, V. I. (2012). Prohrama vyroshchuvannia kroliv [Rabbit breeding program]. Lviv: Lvivskyi natsionalnyi universytet veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii im. S. Z. Hzhytskoho [in Ukrainian].
  6. Kozyr', V. S. (2002). Prakticheskie metodiki issledovanij v zhivotnovodstve [Practical research methods in animal husbandry]. Dnepropetrovsk: Art-Press [in Russian].
  7. Kosianenko, O. M., Cherniuk, S. V., Kuzmenko, O. A., & Karavashenko, V. F. (2013). Vplyv riznykh doz prebiotyku v kombikormakh na produktyvnist molodniaku kroliv [Influence of different doses of prebiotic in compound feeds on the productivity of young rabbits]. Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu silskoho hospodarstva imeni Petra Vasylenka. Tekhnichni systemy i tekhnolohii tvarynnytstva [Bulletin of the Petro Vasylenko Kharkiv National Technical University of Agriculture. Technical systems and technologies of animal husbandry]. Kharkiv,132, 163–167 [in Ukrainian].
  8. Plotnikov, V. G. (2004). O poleznosti krol'chatiny [About the usefulness of rabbit meat]. Krolikovodstvo i zverovodstvo, 4, 21–22 [in Russian].
  9. Pokhylko, Yu. M., Kravchenko, N. O., Bozhok, L. V., Aheiev, V. O., & Dmytruk, O. M. (2015). Osoblyvosti kyshkovoho mikrobotsenozu molodniaku kroliv za riznykh typiv hodivli [Features of intestinal microcoenosis of young rabbits with different types of feeding]. Silskohospodarska mikrobiolohiia,22, 48–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.35868/1997-3004.22.48-52 [in Ukrainian].
  10. Randelina, V. V. (2001). Osobennosti ispol'zovanija porodnyh resursov krupnogo rogatogo skota v povysheniij effektivnosti sistemnyh tehnologij proizvodstva govjadiny [Features of the use of breed resources of cattle in increasing the efficiency of systemic technologies for beef production] (Сandidate’s thesis). Volgograd [in Russian].
  11. Timoshko, M. A. (1990). Mikroflora pishhevaritel'nogo trakta molodnjaka sel'skohozjajstvennyh zhivotnyh [Microflora of the digestive tract of young farm animals]. Kishinjov : Shtiinica [in Russian].
  12. Chornyi, M. V., & Kulak, V. V. (2016, november 06). Rezystentnist i produktyvnist kroliv pry vykorystanni probiotyka «Evitaliia» v umovakh normatyvnoho mikroklimatu [Resistance and productivity of rabbits when using probiotic "Evitalia" in a regulatory microclimate]. Naukovyi visnyk Lvivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu veterynarnoi medytsyny ta biotekhnolohii imeni S.Z. Gzhytskoho[Scientific Bulletin of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnology named after S. Z. Gzhytsky]. Lviv, 18.2(66), 192–196. doi: 10.15421/nvlvet6638 [in Ukrainian].
  13. Dychok-Nedzelska, A. Z., Lesyk, Ya. V., & Kovalchuk, I. I. (2019). The effect of sulfur compounds on the content of microelements in tissue organism rabbits. Scientific Messenger of LNU of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies. 21, 95, 161–165.
  14. Food and Agriculture Organization (2021). [electronic resource]. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org.
  15. Ivanytska, A. I., Lesyk, Ya. V., Kropyvka, S. Y., & Hoivanovych, N. K. (2017). Growth and development of the organism rabbits for the feeding of the silicon connection. Scientific Messenger of Lviv National University of Veterinary Medicine and Biotechnologies, 19(82), 82–87. doi: 10.15421/nvlvet8217.

Пошук по сайту

Оголошення

 Ми у соцмережах

 

 

Оголошується набір статей до чергового 128 номеру НТБ (правила оформлення)

Наукометричні профілі науковців ІТ НААН (подивитися)

Увага! Змінилася адреса Інституту (подивитися)

Об’ява! Оренда приміщення  (детальніше)

Звіти діяльності ДП ДГ "Гонтарівка" (подивитися)

Корисна інформація

Послуги і пропозиції:

- дослідження якості кормів та продукції тваринного походження: (Прайс)

- молекулярно-генетичні і фізіолого-біохімічні дослідження: (Прайс)

- перелік послуг, що надаються ІТ НААН:(прайс)


Наукова література